4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Firestone Winterhawk 3Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Winterhawk 3

R13 – R18
Michelin Alpin 5Prémio
MichelinMichelin

Alpin 5

R15 – R21
Continental WinterContact TS 860Prémio
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 860

R13 – R17
Uniroyal MS plus 77Médio-alto
UniroyalUniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Número de testes
14
17
23
19
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#3
Average position
16.0
5.9
2.3
11.2
Teste mais recente
2020
2018
2021
2021
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
91
76
76

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal MS plus 77
86%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 3
73%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
95%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
55%
Michelin Alpin 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
63%
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
87%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Desempenho na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
72%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal MS plus 77
85%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
87%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
84%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
87%
Conforto e ruído
Firestone Winterhawk 3
78%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
83%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Ruído externo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
84%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Conforto ao rodar
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
97%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
87%
Economia
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2018195/65 R15Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação