4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
14
17
3
Best position
#3
#1
#4
Average position
16.0
1.7
4.3
Teste mais recente
2020
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
80
97

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Neve

Neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Desempenho na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Encanto da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Preço/valor
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído interior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Gelo

Gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação