Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Médio-alto

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Número de testes

21

10

4

3

Best position

#2

#3

#2

Average position

11.9

6.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

Teste mais recente

2024

2026

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

164

104

111

40

34

Molhado

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Frenagem úmida

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Curva em círculo molhado

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Guia lateral húmida

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Seco

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Travagem a seco

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Manuseamento a seco

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Resposta da direcção seca

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Conforto

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído interior

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Conforto

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Custos

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Quilometragem

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Preço/valor

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação