Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Médio-alto

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Número de testes

21

14

18

3

Best position

#2

#8

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

13.4

6.1

3.3

Teste mais recente

2024

2026

2024

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

164

153

47

60

Molhado

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Frenagem úmida

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Curva em círculo molhado

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Guia lateral húmida

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Seco

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Travagem a seco

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Manuseamento a seco

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Conforto

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Ruído exterior

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Conforto

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Ruído interior

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Custos

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Quilometragem

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Preço/valor

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação