4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
21
14
18
3
3
Best position
#2
#8
#1
#2
#2
Average position
11.9
13.4
6.1
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2024
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
164
153
47
40
34

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação