4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Número de testes
21
8
36
26
18
Best position
#2
#8
#1
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
26.4
3.1
2.2
6.1
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2023
2026
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
164
161
296
66
47

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação