4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Apollo Aspire XP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Apollo
Aspire XP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
21
9
18
49
Best position
#2
#4
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
8.6
6.1
3.2
Teste mais recente
2024
2020
2024
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
164
51
47
213

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Apollo Aspire XP
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação