4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
6
18
3
3
26
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.7
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
146
47
40
34
66

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Mudança de faixa seca
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação