4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Multiseason vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Firestone
Multiseason
Kumho
Solus HA31
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Número de testes
2
3
18
Best position
#5
#8
#1
Average position
13.0
8.3
6.1
Teste mais recente
2018
2019
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
26
82
47

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Multiseason
52%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Multiseason
40%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Multiseason
44%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Multiseason
29%
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Multiseason
89%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Multiseason
78%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Multiseason
61%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Multiseason
67%
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Neve

Neve
Firestone Multiseason
77%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Multiseason
60%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Multiseason
57%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Multiseason
76%
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Quilometragem
Firestone Multiseason
70%
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação