4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Multiseason vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Multiseason
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
2
4
18
1
3
28
Melhor posição
#5
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
13.0
3.3
6.1
1.0
3.7
2.3
Teste mais recente
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
26
40
47
66
36
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Multiseason
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Multiseason
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Multiseason
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Multiseason
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Multiseason
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Multiseason
29%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Neve
Firestone Multiseason
77%
Seco
Firestone Multiseason
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Multiseason
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Conforto
Firestone Multiseason
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Multiseason
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Custos
Firestone Multiseason
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Quilometragem
Firestone Multiseason
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store