4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Multiseason vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Firestone
Multiseason
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
2
18
1
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
6.1
1.0
Teste mais recente
2018
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
26
47
64

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Multiseason
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Multiseason
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Multiseason
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Multiseason
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Multiseason
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Multiseason
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Neve

Neve
Firestone Multiseason
77%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Multiseason
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Multiseason
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Multiseason
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Multiseason
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Multiseason
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Firestone Multiseason
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação