4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
13
3
23
29
14
Best position
#7
#4
#1
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
4.3
3.3
3.7
3.6
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
78
97
176
178
188

Neve

Neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tracção na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Travagem de neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Encanto da neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Manipulação da neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
27%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Desempenho na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%

Molhado

Molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Frenagem úmida
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Curva em círculo molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Desempenho em molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Guia lateral húmida
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Seco

Seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Travagem a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Mudança de faixa seca
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Resposta da direcção seca
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Desempenho em piso seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Custos

Custos
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Preço/valor
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Quilometragem
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Conforto

Conforto
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação