Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Médio-alto

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Polaris 6

Blizzak LM-005

Número de testes

13

3

24

3

49

Best position

#7

#4

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

4.3

2.7

7.0

3.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

78

97

302

98

213

Neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Barum Polaris 6

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tracção na neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Barum Polaris 6

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Travagem de neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Barum Polaris 6

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Encanto da neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Barum Polaris 6

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Manipulação da neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

27%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Barum Polaris 6

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Desempenho na neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Barum Polaris 6

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Orientação lateral sobre a neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Molhado

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Barum Polaris 6

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Barum Polaris 6

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Frenagem úmida

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Barum Polaris 6

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

58%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Barum Polaris 6

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Curva em círculo molhado

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Barum Polaris 6

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Desempenho em molhado

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Barum Polaris 6

64%

Seco

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Manuseamento a seco

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Barum Polaris 6

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Travagem a seco

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Barum Polaris 6

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Mudança de faixa seca

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Resposta da direcção seca

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Desempenho em piso seco

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Barum Polaris 6

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Custos

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Barum Polaris 6

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Resistência ao rolamento

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Barum Polaris 6

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Preço/valor

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Barum Polaris 6

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Quilometragem

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

54%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Barum Polaris 6

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Conforto

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Ruído exterior

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Barum Polaris 6

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Conforto

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Barum Polaris 6

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Todo-o-terreno

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Polaris 6

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Neve

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Todo-o-terreno

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação