4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Falken
Azenis FK510
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Número de testes
29
33
36
18
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
5.4
4.1
3.1
6.1
Teste mais recente
2022
2025
2023
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
125
658
296
47

Molhado

Molhado
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Falken Azenis FK510
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Curva em círculo molhado
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Guia lateral húmida
Falken Azenis FK510
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Desempenho em molhado
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%

Seco

Seco
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Mudança de faixa seca
Falken Azenis FK510
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Falken Azenis FK510
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Comportamento em condução seca
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ruído exterior
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Conforto
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Falken Azenis FK510
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Custos

Custos
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Resistência ao rolamento
Falken Azenis FK510
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Quilometragem
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Preço/valor
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Eficiência de combustível
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação