4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Michelin ALPIN 7 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Michelin
ALPIN 7
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
2
29
24
23
17
6
49
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
1.5
3.7
2.7
3.3
1.7
3.7
3.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
65
178
302
176
80
62
213

Molhado

Molhado
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Curva em círculo molhado
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Michelin ALPIN 7
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Frenagem úmida
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%

Neve

Neve
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Encanto da neve
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Manipulação da neve
Dunlop Winter
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Tracção na neve
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin ALPIN 7
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Desempenho na neve
Dunlop Winter
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin ALPIN 7
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Travagem de neve
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%

Seco

Seco
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem a seco
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Michelin ALPIN 7
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Desempenho em piso seco
Dunlop Winter
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Michelin ALPIN 7
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%

Custos

Custos
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Preço/valor
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Quilometragem
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Conforto

Conforto
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Conforto
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Ruído exterior
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação