4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
10
3
14
23
Best position
#1
#4
#1
#1
Average position
4.2
4.3
3.6
6.7
Teste mais recente
2022
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
28
97
188
107

Molhado

Molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Desempenho em molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Seco

Seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Manuseamento a seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Neve

Neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Tracção na neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Manipulação da neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Travagem de neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Desempenho na neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

Custos

Custos
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Quilometragem
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Preço/valor
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Ruído interior
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Gelo

Gelo
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação