4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
10
49
14
17
3
23
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#4
#1
Average position
4.2
3.2
5.5
1.7
4.3
6.7
Teste mais recente
2022
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
28
213
78
80
97
107

Molhado

Molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Seco

Seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Manuseamento a seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Neve

Neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Tracção na neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Manipulação da neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Travagem de neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Desempenho na neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

Custos

Custos
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Quilometragem
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Preço/valor
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Ruído interior
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Gelo

Gelo
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação