4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
10
49
24
3
23
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#4
#1
Average position
4.2
3.2
2.7
4.3
6.7
Teste mais recente
2022
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
28
213
302
97
107

Molhado

Molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Desempenho em molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Curva em círculo molhado
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Seco

Seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Manuseamento a seco
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Neve

Neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Tracção na neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Travagem de neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Manipulação da neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Desempenho na neve
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

Custos

Custos
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Quilometragem
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Eficiência de combustível
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Preço/valor
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Ruído interior
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Gelo

Gelo
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação