Comparação: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Prémio

Dunlop

SP Winter Response 2

R14 – R16

VS

Prémio

Bridgestone

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

SP Winter Response 2

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-005

Número de testes

10

15

19

24

49

Best position

#1

#4

#3

#1

Average position

4.2

7.9

11.2

2.7

3.2

Teste mais recente

2022

2018

2021

2025

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

28

132

76

302

213

Molhado

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Frenagem úmida

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Desempenho em molhado

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Curva em círculo molhado

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Seco

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Travagem a seco

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Comportamento em condução seca

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Desempenho em piso seco

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Manuseamento a seco

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Neve

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tracção na neve

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Travagem de neve

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Manipulação da neve

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Desempenho na neve

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Custos

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Eficiência de combustível

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Quilometragem

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Resistência ao rolamento

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Preço/valor

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Conforto

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Ruído exterior

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Ruído interior

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Gelo

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Travagem brusca

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Dunlop SP Winter Response 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

SP Winter Response 2

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação