4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

CST
Medallion MD-A1
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Número de testes
2
14
18
Best position
#10
#8
#1
Average position
21.5
13.4
6.1
Teste mais recente
2019
2026
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
264
153
47

Molhado

Molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Frenagem úmida
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Seco

Seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Manuseamento a seco
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Resistência ao rolamento
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Conforto

Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ruído exterior
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação