4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Número de testes
17
3
3
23
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
1.7
3.3
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
80
40
34
176

Neve

Neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Travagem de neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Tracção na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Manipulação da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Encanto da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Aceleração de neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%

Molhado

Molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Frenagem úmida
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Seco

Seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Travagem a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ruído exterior
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Ruído interior
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Quilometragem
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Preço/valor
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Gelo

Gelo
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação