4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
29
49
23
6
24
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#9
#1
Average position
3.7
3.2
3.3
24.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
178
213
176
61
302

Neve

Neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Tracção na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
47%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem de neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
48%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Manipulação da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Encanto da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Desempenho na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Molhado

Molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
43%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
29%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
38%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
25%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%

Seco

Seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
32%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Ruído interior
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Custos

Custos
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Preço/valor
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
26%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
26%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação