4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
23
15
3
Best position
#1
#4
#4
Average position
2.3
7.9
4.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2018
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
76
132
97

Seco

Seco
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Molhado

Molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Frenagem úmida
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Desempenho em molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%

Neve

Neve
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tracção na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Travagem de neve
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Encanto da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Desempenho na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído interior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Custos

Custos
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Quilometragem
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Eficiência de combustível
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Preço/valor
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Gelo

Gelo
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Travagem brusca
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação