Comparação: Continental VanContact Winter vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Prémio

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

VS

Médio-alto

BFGoodrich

Comparar também com

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Perfil do teste

VanContact Winter

Advantage

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Número de testes

2

14

3

Melhor posição

#1

#8

#2

Posição média

1.0

13.4

3.3

Teste mais recente

2019

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

46

153

60

40

Seco

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Travagem a seco

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Desempenho em piso seco

Continental VanContact Winter

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Manuseamento a seco

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Molhado

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Frenagem úmida

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Curva em círculo molhado

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Continental VanContact Winter

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Continental VanContact Winter

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Desempenho em molhado

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Neve

Continental VanContact Winter

75%

Conforto

Continental VanContact Winter

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Ruído exterior

Continental VanContact Winter

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Ruído interior

Continental VanContact Winter

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Custos

Continental VanContact Winter

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Resistência ao rolamento

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Quilometragem

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Gelo

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Continental VanContact Winter vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

VanContact Winter

Advantage

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Seco

Molhado

Neve

Conforto

Custos

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação