Comparação: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Prémio

Continental

UltraContact NXT

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Potenza Sport

Número de testes

2

3

23

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.7

3.3

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

23

34

40

188

Molhado

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Frenagem úmida

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Guia lateral húmida

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

94%

Curva em círculo molhado

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Seco

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Travagem a seco

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Manuseamento a seco

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Mudança de faixa seca

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Resposta da direcção seca

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

97%

Conforto

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Ruído exterior

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Conforto

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Custos

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Resistência ao rolamento

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Potenza Sport

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação