Comparação: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Prémio

Continental

UltraContact NXT

VS

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5

R15 – R21

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

UltraContact NXT

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Número de testes

2

14

3

Best position

#1

#8

#2

Average position

1.0

13.4

3.3

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

23

153

40

Molhado

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Frenagem úmida

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Curva em círculo molhado

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Guia lateral húmida

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Seco

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Travagem a seco

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Manuseamento a seco

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Mudança de faixa seca

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Conforto

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Ruído exterior

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Conforto

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Custos

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Resistência ao rolamento

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação