4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Continental PremiumContact 7Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Prémio
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Médio-alto
YokohamaYokohama

BluEarth-XT

5.5
R13 – R
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
26
13
6
1
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#7
#1
#2
Average position
2.2
4.3
4.7
7.0
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
123
146
—
64
34

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
60%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Falken
e.Ziex
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
83%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
62%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
75%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
59%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
46%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
100%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
96%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
70%
Falken
e.Ziex
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
67%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Conforto e ruído
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
66%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Falken
e.Ziex
Ruído externo
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Economia
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
49%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
76%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken
e.Ziex
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 7
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2025215/55 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação