Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Prémio

Continental

PremiumContact 7

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 5

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Cinturato P7 C2

Test profile

PremiumContact 7

Ecsta HS52

ULTRAC

Ventus Prime 4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Número de testes

26

10

—

13

18

Best position

#1

#2

—

#2

#1

Average position

2.2

6.0

—

6.2

6.1

Teste mais recente

2026

—

2026

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

66

104

—

530

47

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em molhado

80%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

73%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

81%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

58%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

65%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Frenagem úmida

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

75%

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

48%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Vredestein ULTRAC

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

58%

Curva em círculo molhado

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

88%

Vredestein ULTRAC

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Continental PremiumContact 7

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

65%

Vredestein ULTRAC

94%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Continental PremiumContact 7

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

62%

Vredestein ULTRAC

98%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Desempenho em piso seco

92%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

86%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

82%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

75%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

51%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Travagem a seco

Continental PremiumContact 7

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Manuseamento a seco

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

93%

Vredestein ULTRAC

87%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

32%

Conforto e ruído

75%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

66%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

74%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

61%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

73%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ruído externo

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

60%

Vredestein ULTRAC

65%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Ruído interno

Continental PremiumContact 7

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Economia

78%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

75%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

42%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

74%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

100%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Resistência ao rolamento

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

67%

Vredestein ULTRAC

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

84%

Quilometragem

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

83%

Vredestein ULTRAC

24%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2024	205/55 R16	Ver
ADAC	Verão	2024	215/55 R17	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ecsta HS52

ULTRAC

Ventus Prime 4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação