4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Continental PremiumContact 7Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Bridgestone Turanza T005Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Turanza T005

8.8
R14 – R23
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Número de testes
26
3
1
33
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.2
3.3
1.0
4.1
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
40
64
658

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Desempenho em molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Guia lateral húmida
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Preço/valor
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Ruído interior
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação