4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Continental
SportContact 7
Número de testes
26
5
3
3
7
15
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.2
2.2
3.7
3.3
2.4
1.2
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
63
34
40
137
122

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
95%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
80%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%
Continental SportContact 7
80%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação