4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
26
6
1
3
3
5
Best position
#1
#3
#7
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.2
4.7
7.0
3.3
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
146
40
34
63

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preço/valor
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação