4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental PremiumContact 6Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
General Tire Grabber GT PlusBudget
GeneralGeneral

Tire Grabber GT Plus

4.3
R15 – R23
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
36
2
1
3
6
Best position
#1
#9
#1
#2
#3
Average position
3.1
9.0
1.0
3.7
4.7
Teste mais recente
2023
2023
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
296
64
64
34
146

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Guia lateral húmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Preço/valor
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação