4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Continental PremiumContact 6Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
General Tire Grabber GT PlusBudget
GeneralGeneral

Tire Grabber GT Plus

4.3
R15 – R23
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta PS71Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Número de testes
36
6
2
1
15
Best position
#1
#3
#9
#1
#2
Average position
3.1
4.7
9.0
1.0
9.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
296
146
64
64
225

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Desempenho em molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Ruído interior
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Eficiência de combustível
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Preço/valor
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação