4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
36
6
2
1
Best position
#1
#3
#9
#1
Average position
3.1
4.7
9.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2023
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
296
146
64
64

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Eficiência de combustível
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Preço/valor
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação