4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Continental PremiumContact 6Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
General Tire Grabber GT PlusBudget
GeneralGeneral

Tire Grabber GT Plus

4.3
R15 – R23
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
36
6
2
3
1
Best position
#1
#3
#9
#2
#1
Average position
3.1
4.7
9.0
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
296
146
64
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Resposta da direcção seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação