4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
2
10
3
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
6.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
104
40

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação