4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Número de testes
2
10
18
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
6.0
6.1
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
104
47

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação