4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Número de testes
2
3
10
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
6.0
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
40
104

Molhado

Molhado
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Frenagem úmida
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Seco

Seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Travagem a seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Ruído exterior
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Custos

Custos
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação