4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
5
11
18
3
3
Melhor posição
#7
#1
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
13.0
11.6
6.1
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2022
2024
2024
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
676
121
47
34
40

Molhado

Molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Seco

Seco
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Ruído interior
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Eficiência de combustível
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Quilometragem
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação