4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
5
3
23
14
3
Melhor posição
#7
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
13.0
3.3
3.3
3.6
3.7
Teste mais recente
2022
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
676
40
176
188
34

Molhado

Molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Desempenho em molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Seco

Seco
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Custos

Custos
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Preço/valor
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação