4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
5
3
6
1
3
Best position
#7
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2022
2026
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
676
40
146
64
40

Molhado

Molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Desempenho em molhado
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%

Seco

Seco
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comportamento em condução seca
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Eficiência de combustível
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Quilometragem
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação