Comparação: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Económico

Ceat

4 SeasonDrive X5

VS

Comparar também com

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Perfil do teste

4 SeasonDrive X5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Número de testes

2

3

18

1

3

Melhor posição

#4

#2

#1

#2

Posição média

6.0

3.3

6.1

1.0

3.7

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

—

40

47

64

34

Molhado

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Frenagem úmida

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Neve

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

72%

Seco

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Manuseamento a seco

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Travagem a seco

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Custos

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Preço/valor

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Resistência ao rolamento

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Quilometragem

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Conforto

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Conforto

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

4 SeasonDrive X5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação