4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
12
10
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.8
6.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2017
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
104
40

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Turanza T001
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação