4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
ZIEX ZE320
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
23
3
5
26
3
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
3.3
6.4
2.2
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2026
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
188
60
43
66
40

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
98%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Resposta da direcção seca
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
82%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
58%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
1%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação