Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Barum Polaris 6

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak LM-005

Speed-Grip 5

EuroWinter HS01

WinterContact TS 870

Polaris 6

Número de testes

49

12

23

17

3

Best position

#1

#3

#5

#1

#2

Average position

3.2

9.3

11.0

1.7

7.0

Teste mais recente

2024

2025

2022

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

213

93

359

80

98

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

68%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Barum Polaris 6

83%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

66%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Barum Polaris 6

89%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

60%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Barum Polaris 6

89%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

72%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Barum Polaris 6

85%

Encanto da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

73%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Barum Polaris 6

63%

Aceleração de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

94%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

97%

Barum Polaris 6

100%

Orientação lateral sobre a neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

60%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

100%

Desempenho na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

63%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

67%

Barum Polaris 6

79%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

64%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

49%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Barum Polaris 6

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

76%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Barum Polaris 6

78%

Mudança de faixa seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

95%

Resposta da direcção seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Comportamento em condução seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

76%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Desempenho em piso seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

72%

Barum Polaris 6

77%

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

64%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Barum Polaris 6

78%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

58%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Barum Polaris 6

80%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

68%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

64%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Barum Polaris 6

74%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Barum Polaris 6

76%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

63%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Barum Polaris 6

75%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

68%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Barum Polaris 6

94%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

80%

Barum Polaris 6

69%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

67%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

71%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

61%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Barum Polaris 6

88%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

83%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

47%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Barum Polaris 6

97%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

45%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Barum Polaris 6

69%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

79%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

Barum Polaris 6

92%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

28%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Travagem brusca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

28%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

73%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Barum Polaris 6

Blizzak LM-005

Speed-Grip 5

EuroWinter HS01

WinterContact TS 870

Polaris 6

Test profile

Neve

Seco

Molhado

Conforto

Custos

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação