4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Barum
Polaris 5
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
49
3
13
28
24
Best position
#1
#4
#9
#2
#1
Average position
3.2
4.3
15.2
8.0
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
213
97
76
115
302

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Encanto da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Desempenho na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Resposta da direcção seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Mudança de faixa seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Barum Polaris 5
51%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Barum Polaris 5
62%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Barum Polaris 5
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Barum Polaris 5
66%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Barum Polaris 5
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Barum Polaris 5
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Barum Polaris 5
77%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Barum Polaris 5
87%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação