4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
49
23
3
17
Best position
#1
#1
#4
#1
Average position
3.2
6.7
4.3
1.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
213
107
97
80

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
100%
Aceleração de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Desempenho na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Resposta da direcção seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação