4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Yokohama
W.drive V905
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Número de testes
15
10
19
14
8
23
Best position
#4
#7
#3
#3
#12
#1
Average position
7.9
14.0
11.2
16.0
22.3
2.3
Teste mais recente
2018
2019
2021
2020
2021
2021
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
8
76
66
43
76

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Yokohama W.drive V905
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Yokohama W.drive V905
68%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Yokohama W.drive V905
91%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
88%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Yokohama W.drive V905
86%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Yokohama W.drive V905
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Yokohama W.drive V905
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Yokohama W.drive V905
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Yokohama W.drive V905
62%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Yokohama W.drive V905
59%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Yokohama W.drive V905
53%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
75%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Yokohama W.drive V905
73%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2017225/50 R17Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2016205/55 R16Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação