Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

Snowtrac 5

W.drive V905

MP92 Sibir Snow

Número de testes

15

19

12

10

8

Best position

#4

#3

#4

#7

#12

Average position

7.9

11.2

12.6

14.0

22.3

Teste mais recente

2018

2021

2019

2021

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

76

57

8

43

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

70%

Yokohama W.drive V905

69%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

72%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

71%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

69%

Yokohama W.drive V905

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

73%

Yokohama W.drive V905

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

67%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

73%

Yokohama W.drive V905

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Desempenho em molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

70%

Yokohama W.drive V905

68%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

84%

Yokohama W.drive V905

91%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

82%

Yokohama W.drive V905

88%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Comportamento em condução seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

78%

Yokohama W.drive V905

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

67%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

89%

Yokohama W.drive V905

92%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Desempenho em piso seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

86%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

75%

Yokohama W.drive V905

72%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Eficiência de combustível

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

88%

Yokohama W.drive V905

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

83%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

65%

Yokohama W.drive V905

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

65%

Yokohama W.drive V905

62%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

70%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

82%

Yokohama W.drive V905

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

79%

Yokohama W.drive V905

76%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

84%

Yokohama W.drive V905

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

85%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

66%

Yokohama W.drive V905

59%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

61%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

67%

Yokohama W.drive V905

53%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

60%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

81%

Yokohama W.drive V905

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Travagem brusca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

83%

Yokohama W.drive V905

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

89%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2016	205/55 R16	Ver
Autobild	Inverno	2015	185/60 R15	Ver

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

Snowtrac 5

W.drive V905

MP92 Sibir Snow

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Neve

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Testes mútuos

Contribuir para a comparação