4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Vredestein
Snowtrac 5
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
15
19
12
24
Best position
#4
#3
#4
#1
Average position
7.9
11.2
12.6
2.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2021
2019
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
76
57
302

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
88%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
81%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
80%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação